MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
October 14, 2026

ARCHIVE Chestertown Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Chestertown

  • << RETURN TO CHESTERTOWN SPY
  • << RETURN TO CHESTERTOWN SPY
8 Letters to Editor Archives

Letter to the Editor: What Happened to Wilmer Park?

August 22, 2025 by Spy Desk

Dear Chestertown Spy

I was devastated when I went for my walk at Wilmer Park and found the beautiful shoreline was mowed down and destroyed. The beautiful marsh grasses, the hibiscus, morning glory and wild flowers. Hummingbirds, butterflies, bees, and a lot of wildlife made this shoreline their home. The town I understand did this. I am not sure if they had approval from DNR. I am hoping you could look into this. So many of us are shocked and deeply saddened. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely, Cecilia Brown

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 8 Letters to Editor, Archives

From and Fuller: What is Obama Doing in California and Newsom Starts Using Trump Playbook Chestertown Flashback: Washington College Class of 1895

Letters to Editor

  1. Gren Whitman says

    August 22, 2025 at 3:09 PM

    Whoever OKed destruction of vegetation and habitat inWilmer Park is obliged to explain why.
    Thank you, Cecilia, for your righteous howl of dismay.

  2. Lindsay Batcheller says

    August 22, 2025 at 3:51 PM

    Dear Cecilia Brown,

    Thank you for your message. I hope this won’t happen this again. I thought it was against the law to interfere in wetlands in any way? The shorelines are so important.

  3. Liz says

    August 23, 2025 at 5:37 AM

    I was walking there about a week and a half ago and there were two men working the shoreline with a backhoe. It appeared as though they were doing some repair work along the bulkhead and the shoreline. Being a waterfront property owner myself, I understand that sometimes you have to get to the problem in order to fix it. You cannot get a backhoe or other equipment to work on the shoreline without disturbing the habitat. That being the case, the marsh grasses will grow back, along with the rest of the flora and fauna.

    Additionally, if you look along the riverfront section of bulkhead, it’s obvious that tidal levels rise over it. Over time, this takes a toll on the structure and the surrounding areas. I know how that goes!

    I think that the area will recover and the situation will resolve itself.

  4. Chris Cerino says

    August 23, 2025 at 12:19 PM

    The living shoreline that was recently cut back significantly by the Town was, in fact, planted by the Town approximately 20 years ago. Since that happened, many plants – both native and nonnative – that were not part of the original plantings have made their way into that space. Most problematic of these are groundsel tree and phragmites. Groundsel tree is a native woody shrub that grows to 12′ tall and equally as wide. This blocked off river views for residents walking along the water’s edge and also crowded out the public access point to the river near the ramp to the Wilmer Park pavilion. Another invasive plant that made its way to the living shoreline is phragmites, also known as the common reed. Phragmites aggressively crowds out native vegetation and also grows to 12′ high, blocking out river views even further. I am sure that by this time next year most of the native grasses will return to their full splendor and the degraded shoreline that everyone sees right now will be a distant memory.

    • Brigette Perry says

      September 13, 2025 at 11:06 PM

      Two questions;
      “who”approved and had oversight of the indiscriminate removal of All vegetation that was proudly planted by local residents and environmentalists over 20 years?

      Was a DNR permit required for backhoe removal of vegetation planted to maintain shoreline erosion?

      From my perspective, if the site was appropriately maintained by the town and not influenced by a recently donated bench, this event would not have occurred.

      • Lolli Sherry says

        September 22, 2025 at 4:36 PM

        Read Chris Cerino’s letter again. He makes perfectly clear why this was a good idea and a benefit to the shoreline.

Copyright © 2026

Affiliated News

  • The Cambridge Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Health
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2026 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in